bugs.ly

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> to work.  These chords are really
> beautiful, and something very bad is happening to them.

Is this a bugreport - if yes, please be clear about your gripes.

> a:maj7+9 s s % this chord is supposed to be an A9maj7 or Amaj9
>              % or Amaj7add9 or Amaj79.  Instead it becomes an Amaj7/9,
>              % which is bogus.  The ninth is not the bass
>              % note.  I have never seen a ChordNameSeparator anywhere

The chord-naming scheme is consistent  with Ignatzek's book. If you 
prefer another system, you're welcome to code support for it.

Han-Wen
(Getting very tired of yet another chord name request)

-- 

 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen