[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: feta20.enc not found
From: |
David Bobroff |
Subject: |
Re: feta20.enc not found |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:54:21 +0000 |
At 07:15 PM 4/7/2004 +0200, you wrote:
>David Bobroff writes:
>
>>> kpsewhich f7b6d320.enc
>>
>> Nothing, I'm just returned to the prompt.
>
>> tetex-1.0.7-66
>
>Ouch, in three weeks that will be four years old. Would it be
>acceptable to ask for an upgrade?
Ouch, indeed. I checked around and it seems that 2.0.2-* is available.
It's a bit annoying that RedHat hasn't seen fit to update this package in
their distribution. Then again, RedHat 9 will see no more updates/errata
fixes after the end of this month anyway so maybe I should look for a
different distribution. Before I do that (and what distros have a fairly
recent tetex?) can I simply grab all the tetex-*-2.0.2-* rpms and install
them or am I likely to run into a cascade of rpm dependencies? (I hate it
when that happens.)
>
>I'm a bit reluctant to include missing tetex files into lilypond, just
>to be compatible with such old software.
Understood.
-David
- feta20.enc not found, David Bobroff, 2004/04/07
- Re: feta20.enc not found, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/04/07
- Re: feta20.enc not found, David Bobroff, 2004/04/07
- Re: feta20.enc not found, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/04/07
- Re: feta20.enc not found, David Bobroff, 2004/04/07
- Re: feta20.enc not found, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/04/07
- Re: feta20.enc not found,
David Bobroff <=
- Re: feta20.enc not found, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/04/10
- Re: feta20.enc not found, David Bobroff, 2004/04/10
- Re: feta20.enc not found, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/04/10
- [OT]Re: feta20.enc not found, David Bobroff, 2004/04/10
- [OT]Re: feta20.enc not found, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/04/10