[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug in lilypond-book latex output?

From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: Bug in lilypond-book latex output?
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:37:59 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616

You are absolutely right! This bug has already been fixed in
version 2.2.3.


Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:

While fiddling with lilypond-book (from lilypond version 2.2.1), I
took a look at the generated code that replaces the \lilypond{}
fragment in my LaTeX document.  It looks like this:

  {\parindent 0pt
  \input lily-161076161.tex

I'm wondering if there isn't a problem in the handling of
\postLilyPondExample.  I'm not familiar with TeX beyond the basics of
LaTeX, but I'm assuming that \ifx tests if the following symbol is
executable...so the second test:


Is checking the wrong symbol, and would result in an error if someone
defined \preLilyPondExample but did not define \postLilyPondExample.

-- Lars

bug-lilypond mailing list

        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]