bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: manual bug? and same pdf bug


From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Subject: Re: manual bug? and same pdf bug
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:03:47 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)

Paul Scott writes:

> Really my major concern is that whatever generates the PDF's doesn't
> use the same paper size as the dvi and ps.

Try --verbose, it works for me (using a6, that's easier to check than letter)

    \version "2.3.22"
    \paper {
        #(set-paper-size "a6")
    }

    \relative  {
         c' d e f g\break
         c d e f g\break
    }

    Output written on x.dvi (1 page, 3188 bytes).
    Transcript written on x.log.
    Invoking "dvips -t a6   -u+ec-mftrace.map -u+lilypond.map -Ppdf x"
    This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software 
(www.radicaleye.com)
    ' TeX output 2004.10.11:1300' -> x.ps
    <tex.pro><alt-rule.pro><texc.pro><music-drawing-routines.ps><texps.pro>
    <special.pro>. <feta20.pfa><ecrm10.pfa>[1] 

    Converting to `x.pdf'...
    Invoking `ps2pdf -sPAPERSIZE=a6 x.ps'...

There is, however, some name juggling going on in the TeX backend
only, wrt papersize and papersizename.  I would have removed all
instances of papersizename, but I'd like to hear Han-Wen's thoughts.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]