[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond-book
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond-book |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 01:37:58 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
>
>
> Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >>Are you saying that the trick used in \verb is bad or just that
> >>we should never mention the example below in any documentation
> >>or that we should use the \verb trick but handle pairing characters
> >>specially?
> >
> >
> > The last one. All editors will benefit.
>
> Agreed! Unfortunately, the implementors will suffer. A direct
> implementation of the \verb trick is a one line change (see the
> attachment), whereas your suggestion is much harder to implement without
> major surgery to the current lilypond-book implementation.
Is it that difficult? I would say it is a matter of doing
\\lilypond({(?P<code>[^}]+)}|(?P<delim>.)(?P<code>.*)(?P=delim))
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen