bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Possible bug


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: Possible bug
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:02:48 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913

It should definitely not be part of the LilyPond package.
One possibility is to use Werner's fix and include that in
tetex-tiny.

   /Mats

Bertalan Fodor wrote:
So, what will happen? I'd like to package 2.4.2 for cygwin... Should I put ec.mf into the lilypond package? Or should it be in the tetex-tiny package?


You lost me here.  I thought you found that ecrm1000 should not be
looked for at all?


I tried Bertalan's example file here and the dvips command with
$KPATHSEA_DEBUG set to -1, it does not search for ecrm1000,




I'd gladly fix the Cygwin tetex installation, but I want to be sure to
make the right fix and not add another bug.

Bertalan, what does Mats's command give you?  Can you send a
(comressed) log file to the list?

Jan.





_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]