Re: slurs clashing with portato marks (which are inverted!)

[Mats Bengtsson]

Isn't the idea that you can use c^.^- to get the dot below the
line and c^_ to get the dot above the line?

   /Mats

Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Saturday 01 January 2005 05.41, Wiz Aus wrote:
>
> > What lilypond calls "portato" marks (a staccato dot and tenuto line
> > combined) appear to be inverted - all scores I have have the staccato dot
> > closest to the notehead, and the tenuto line furthest.
>
>
> Added as portato-direction.
>
> Portato doesn't exist in the music I use to play, so I don't know myself which 
> direction that is correct. Do you have concrete examples of well-engraved 
> scores that do it the other way around? Or can anyone else confirm how it 
> should look?
>
> (Most sources I can find prefer tenuto lines, or slurred notes with staccato 
> dots)
>
>
> > Furhermore, slurs do not properly avoid them.
>
>
> Added as c-slur-portato.
>
> Thanks!
> Erik
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================