bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RhythmicStaff not squasing out all the noteheads


From: Rick Hansen (aka RickH)
Subject: Re: RhythmicStaff not squasing out all the noteheads
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:15:23 -0800 (PST)

Just curious, why wouldn't this be a bug?  I've never seen stems with the
same notehead twice before :)  Since most rhythm comping arrangements would
just provide the chord names and the rhythm, and if you already have your
chords in a variable to generate the names just reuse them on rhythmic staff
to show the rhythm...  

Thanks, Rick



Graham Percival-2 wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the report!  This is a feature request, not a bug, but it's 
> worth adding:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=185
> 
> Cheers,
> - Graham
> 
> Rick Hansen (aka RickH) wrote:
>> The RhythmicStaff is not squashing out all the noteheads like it should
>> be. 
>> It is common to want to re-use the notes of a chord progression as either
>> a
>> rhythmic staff or a notes staff (to avoid having to write more music just
>> for the rhythmic staff).  When you use chords on RhythmicStaff it is not
>> squashing out the noteheads.  IOW RhythmicStaff should only recognize
>> durations and not care about notes.  Here is sample code that
>> demonstrates
>> the bug:
>> 
>> \new RhythmicStaff {
>>      \time 4/4
>>      <c e g>2
>>      <c e g>2
>>      <c e g>2
>>      <c e g>4
>>      <c e g>4
>> }
>> 
>> \new RhythmicStaff {
>>      \time 4/4
>>      <c>2
>>      <e>2
>>      <g>2
>>      <c>4
>>      <e>4
>> }
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/RhythmicStaff-not-squasing-out-all-the-noteheads-tf2871439.html#a8041608
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]