|
From: | Marnen Laibow-Koser |
Subject: | Re: Barline scans |
Date: | Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:58:38 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Macintosh/20041103) |
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:I am giving approximate dimensions of barlines, stems, and staff lines in pixels. All scans are 300 dpi, so 1 px = 1/300". Editions areYou need 1200 dpi to get a good impression of the actual thickness. If file size is a problem, you can small areas of the page.
OK. Here are the new measurements from 1200-dpi scans. Same pages as before. If you want to see the images, they're at http://doko.ebon-askavi.homedns.org:8080/1200 . While the numbers are different, once again Lilypond's barlines are far thicker than any other edition relative to the staff lines: all other editions are in the 100%-138% range, while Lilypond weighs in at 191%!
International Staff lines: 13 px Stems: 11 px (85%) Barlines: 13 px (100%) Schirmer Staff lines: 11 px Stems: 6 px (55%!) Barlines: 12 px (109%) Könemann p. 108 Staff lines: 11 px Stems: 15 px (136%) Barlines: 12 px (109%) Wiener Staff lines: 11 px Stems: 10 px (91%) Barlines: 13 px (118%) Henle Staff lines: 11 px Stems: 11 px (100%), or possibly 12 Barlines: 15 px (136%) Könemann p. 12 Staff lines: 13 px Stems: 15 px (115%) Barlines: 18 px (138%) LilypondMeasured a little differently this time: printed at high quality (600 or 1200 dpi, not sure), then scanned at 1200 dpi.
Staff lines: 11 px Stems: 16 px (145%) Barlines: 21 px (191%) Best, Marnen
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |