[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Barline scans
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: Barline scans |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:31:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Marnen Laibow-Koser <address@hidden> writes:
> What do you mean by "further investigation"? My conclusion
I was referring to Werner and Han-Wen. By further investigation, I
meant looking at printed output; comparing with the originals that
Lily's bar lines were designed from and trying to discover where it
has gone awry.
>> I am not sure where his measurement of 250% comes from, because we put
>> 190% in, where baerenreiter (occasionally?) uses 220%.
>
> 250% came from an imprecise 300 dpi image. The 1200 dpi scan of
> Lilypond's output indeed produced 190% (ok, 191%).
Ok, but that means that LilyPond is on the black side of the scale
rather than far off it.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: Barline scans, (continued)
- Re: Barline scans, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: Barline scans, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2007/01/10
- Re: Barline scans, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/10
- Re: Barlines are too thick, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/08
- Re: Barlines are too thick, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2007/01/08