Re: Segfault in old file

[Graham Percival]

Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
> This file, convert-lyed from the LSR, segfaults under 2.11.15. I realise
> that this functionality is now obsolete, but I'm submitting it on the
> basis that All Segfaults Are Evil.

Thanks!

Han-Wen, how evil are segfault?  I have another medium-sized example (38 
lines) of a segfault; should I add these non-minimal examples to the 
tracker immediately, or should I wait until I have time to create a 
minimal example?

Cheers,
- Graham