Re: corrupt collision avoiding when using simultaneous voices

[Graham Percival]

Thanks, added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=428

I agree with you that this is a very, very low-priority bug... but hey, 
we might as well include it in the list.  I'm curious about the 
difference between the first/third cases, anyway.

Cheers,
- Graham


Luc wrote:
> Of course, you are right, specially in guessing what was my intents.
> Thanks for directing my attention to this little, but important detail 
> of creating separate contexts when using \\ - usually I also prefer to 
> explicitly define named voice contexts, but this time I was in a hurry 
> ... my apologies and please consider the importance of this "bug" 
> decreasing to zero.
> Luc
>
> Mats Bengtsson schrieb:
> > I agree that this is a bug. However, I hope you know the simple 
> > workaround
> > in case you want to provide articulations separate from the music. Just
> > put them in one and the same voice:
> >
> > mymusic = { \tempo 4=100 g }
> > myarticulations = {s -0 }
> >
> > \new Voice << \mymusic \myarticulations >>
> >
> > The important thing to notice is that you should NOT use any \\
> > since it will create separate Voice contexts, whereas you want both 
> > "lines
> > of music" in the same Voice context.
> >
> >    /Mats
> >
> > Luc wrote:
> > > \version "2.11.30" %{ windows xp home %}
> > >
> > > { \tempo 4=100 << { g' } \\ { s -0 } >> } % needlessly shifted to 
> > > the right
> > >
> > > { << { g } \\ { s -0} >> }    % no collision avoiding
> > >
> > > { \tempo 4=100 g -0 }  % works
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > bug-lilypond mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond