Issue 551 in lilypond: input/regression/glissando.ly

[codesite-noreply]

Issue 551: input/regression/glissando.ly
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=551

New issue report by gpermus:
%  Nobody is really certain what to do about this example, but clearly
% something needs to be clarified.  -gp

Valentin / Stan discussion:

2008/1/5, Stan Sanderson <address@hidden>:
> regressions: glissando.ly text reads, "The engraver does no time-
> keeping, so it involves some trickery to get << { s8 s8 s4 } { c4
> \gliss d4 } >> working correctly."

I think this is totally deprecated.
First of all, the \gliss syntax mentioned in the comment is no longer correct.
Second, the whole sentence is no longer relevant, as unlike what's
specified, the << { s8 s8 s4 } { c4 \glissando d4 } >> works out of
the box as expected.

> How does it relate to the snippet? Also, the snippet appears to
> render correctly with out the voice and stem direction definitions;
> as follows:

This is a third obsolete element here, the \stemUp command is no longer needed.

I would remove all three deprecated things here, but it is not really 
my call.


Issue attributes:
        Status: Accepted
        Owner: gpermus
        Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Regression

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings