[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:58:27 +0100 |
2008/3/10, Trevor Daniels <address@hidden>:
> Under 2.11.42 the fonts are cached in C:\Documents and
> Settings\[username]\.lilypond-fonts.cache-2. This also
> contains 2 small and one large (682 KB) files, but when
> LilyPond compiles it changes just the large file - every
> time. This is pretty certainly where the extra time is
> going, as the time stamp on this file updates around 45 secs
> after starting the compile.
>
> This may well be the same as the Vista slowness problem
> which was also related to font caching.
Yes, I encountered the same problem on XP; it seems to re-calculate
the font cache on every compilation, and therefore takes ages to
compile anything. However, I didn't report it since I assumed I was
doing something wrong.
Cheers,
Valentin
- Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?, Trevor Daniels, 2008/03/10
- Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/03/11
- Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/03/11
- RE: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?, Trevor Daniels, 2008/03/11
- Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/03/11
- Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/03/12
- RE: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?, Trevor Daniels, 2008/03/13
- Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?, Graham Percival, 2008/03/13
- RE: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?, Trevor Daniels, 2008/03/13
- Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/03/17
- RE: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?, Trevor Daniels, 2008/03/18