Re: Issue 38 in lilypond: collision fingering beam

[Eluze]

codesite-noreply wrote:
> 
> Issue 38: collision fingering beam
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=38
> 
> Comment #2 by n.puttock:
> This is invalid.
> 

i don't really understand what is invalid - there is a collision, it is not
readable and it is not what we are used from liylpond!!!



> Stems are deliberately excluded from the supports of fingerings inside  
> chords unless
> 'add-stem-support = ##t.
> 

i searched the manuals for an example how to use this option and found it
with the snippets repository search which pointed to version 2.10.12:

User backend properties
 add-stem-support (boolean)
  If set, the Stem object is included in this script's support

and

text-script-interface

An object that is put above or below a note 
User settable properties:
 add-stem-support (boolean)
  If set, the Stem object is included in this script's support

so i would like to illustrate it and hope it will also be mentioned in the
actual docs one day:

\relative {
  \set fingeringOrientations = #'(up)
  \set stringNumberOrientations = #'(up)
  \set strokeFingerOrientations = #'(up)
  r 16 [        r
  < f c'^5 > 16 
  \override Fingering #'add-stem-support = ##t
  < f c'^5 > 
        
  < f c' \5 >  
  \override StringNumber #'add-stem-support = ##t
  < f c' \5 >

  < f c'-\rightHandFinger #2 >  
  \override StrokeFinger #'add-stem-support = ##t
  < f c' -\rightHandFinger #2 >]
  }


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Issue-38-in-lilypond%3A-collision-fingering-beam-tp20389835p20531266.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.