[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue 391 in lilypond: using relative filepath in \include "foo.ly"

From: codesite-noreply
Subject: Issue 391 in lilypond: using relative filepath in \include "foo.ly"
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:41:40 +0000

Comment #9 on issue 391 by joeneeman: using relative filepath in \include "foo.ly"

I'm not keen on having two different \include commands with subtly different
behaviour, especially if one of them is only around for historical reasons. How about this: I'll introduce a -d switch that changes the include behaviour and add some docs that recommend using this switch. At some compatibility-breaking point in the future,
the switch will be removed and the relative includes will be the only way.

You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]