bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the acciaccatura collides with the staff


From: Marc Mouries
Subject: Re: the acciaccatura collides with the staff
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:24:55 -0500

Let's stop playing on words. The slur is part of the acciaccatura.
Please take a look at the second measure in  this music sheet 
http://imslp.org/wiki/Special:IMSLPDisclaimerAccept/24837
to see how an acciaccatura with the pitch of c sharp is suppossed to be
printed.



On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 17:53 +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/2/14 Marc Mouries <address@hidden>:
> >>> %% the acciaccatura collides with the staff
> >>>
> >>> \version "2.12.2"
> >>> \include "english.ly"
> >>>
> >>> \paper{ ragged-right=##t }
> >>> \relative g'' {
> >>> d4  \acciaccatura cs'8 d
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>
> >> What's the collision here? Only the slur is a bit clashing with the
> >> ledger line, but I'd not call this a collision.
> >
> > You say it is a bit clashing but you'd not call this a collision. Note that
> > clash is a synonym of collision.
> 
> Well, you're right, let's call it a collision.
> 
> > Anyway, the bug is that the acciaccatura is badly printed.
> 
> I disagree. If the problem is the slur, and not the acciaccatura, then
> let's focus on the slur.
> 
> > I would not
> > qualify the superposition as small because the bug makes the acciaccatura
> > printed on the ledger line and the slur is superposed with the ledger line.
> 
> A note or acciaccatura with the pitch of c is suppossed to be on the
> ledger line. I think the note is correctly positioned. Again, let's
> focus on the slur. How would you print it?
> 
> Otherwise, please clarify what exactly is wrong with the acciaccatura itself.
> 
> As for the qualifying of the potential bug, I do not have that
> authority or knowledge, I'm only trying to help a bit with the mailing
> list.
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]