[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wide-char is wide
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: wide-char is wide |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:30:01 +0100 |
>From your kind explanation would be right to say that the argument to
the LilyPond \char command is a simple natural number and not a
multibyte utf-8 sequence? This is what --I think-- still has to be
made clear.
2009/3/25 Hans Aberg <address@hidden>:
> You might search this page for "code point":
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode
>
> It just a natural number assign to each abstract character it defines. The
> section
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode#Architecture_and_terminology
> describes the convention of writing these numbers with the prefix "U+":
> numbers below 2^16 are written with four hex digit, and other with five or
> six as is needed.
...
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
The incredible carnival of Badajoz
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pacovila/tags/carnaval/show/
- wide-char is wide, Robin Bannister, 2009/03/25
- Re: wide-char is wide, Francisco Vila, 2009/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: wide-char is wide, Francisco Vila, 2009/03/25
- Re: wide-char is wide, Hans Aberg, 2009/03/25
- Re: wide-char is wide,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: wide-char is wide, Hans Aberg, 2009/03/25
- Re: wide-char is wide, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/25
- Re: wide-char is wide, Hans Aberg, 2009/03/26
- Re: wide-char is wide, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/26
Re: wide-char is wide, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/25