[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wide-char is wide
|
From: |
Robin Bannister |
|
Subject: |
Re: wide-char is wide |
|
Date: |
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:31:07 +0000 (UTC) |
|
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I prefer to use "Unicode hexadecimal value".
There are too many sorts of Unicode hexadecimal values
for this to be reliably unambiguous.
I think the "hexadecimal" bit is a red herring
and only needs mentioning once, as in:
> where hhhh is the hexadecimal code for the character required
Cheers,
Robin
- Re: wide-char is wide, (continued)
Re: wide-char is wide, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/25
Re: wide-char is wide, Robin Bannister, 2009/03/25
Re: wide-char is wide, Robin Bannister, 2009/03/25
Re: wide-char is wide,
Robin Bannister <=