Re: lilypond-book is not flavor independent

[Cláudia Soares]

On 2009/03/28, at 13:46, Graham Percival wrote:
> Also, convert-ly requires decorator functions (I think that was
> the name), which are another 2.4 feature.
decorators are another issue. No back compatibility in python < 2.4.
Sometimes I wonder why are we coding python if it changes so much...

Does Guido expects that we keep rewriting our old work over and over  
again?
Sorry for the rant. Each time I think about such things I love lisp  
more and more...


> I should clarify another point: out of all the main developers, I
> know the least about python and cross-platform building.  I'm just
> discussing these points with you because I happen to have time at
> the moment, and I remember (most) of the answers from when I asked
> these questions in the past few years.  :)
Thank you, you've been quite helpful. I hope I can contribute on  
this. If lilypond-book manages to get well&easily installed in the  
mac systems maybe the big bunch of musicians and mac users start to  
switch to lilypond, namely to prepare lesson materials or simple  
texts with musical ideas. This latex lilypond integration is a very  
good concept.

>
Cheers,
Cláudia

|♪♫♪|♫♫|♪♫♪|