bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug report: measure numbering after repeat with alternativeendings


From: Alexander Kobel
Subject: Re: Bug report: measure numbering after repeat with alternativeendings
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:02:35 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)

Mats Bengtsson wrote:
This is another incarnation of Issue 355, which in my opinion is a clear bug.

However, I'm not equally certain that the bar numbering always is done the way Paul proposes and would have to look through my collection of scores to see what is the most common typesetting
practice.
Does anybody have authoritative information on how the bar numbering should be done with alternative
endings?

   /Mats

Well, it's certainly not authoritative, but since I admire the engraving practice in the Bärenreiter Urtext editions... In several piano reductions, they use running measure numbers along the repeats, and depict both numbers, repeats in parentheses, like this:


                  (18)
         --------|:-------|--------|--------|--------|

6 (22)
--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|

12 (28)                                     {1.      }
--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------:|

33
{2.     }
--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|

39
--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|


I think it's particularly useful to denote the measure number of the first repeated measure, even if it's in the middle of a line.
Note that the volta bars are counted, too.

This way, each point in time is uniquely identified, which should please both the programmer's and the conductor's view.

Of course, things get ugly if there is a part repeated more than once; I haven't spotted such a thing in my Bach scores from Bärenreiter. By the way, if the whole piece gets repeated, they don't print bar numbers for each stanza. Also, one could argue to use the same numbering scheme for D.C., D.S. or Coda constructions - at least for D.C. and D.S. without jumps in the end, they don't do that. I don't have an example with a Coda.

On the other hand, more complicated constructions with >= 3 repeats typically appear in more modern popular music, where AFAIK everybody tends to use the stanza numbers in the rehearsals.


Just my two pence...
Alexander




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]