Re: Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

[lilypond]

Comment #22 on issue 903 by Carl.D.Sorensen: Enhancement: a more  
user-friendly way to specify notename languages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903

> veryfurryfur: yes, there can be syntax changes in 2.13.9, but not in  
> 2.12.3.  This is
> no negotiable.  There _can_ be syntax *additions*, but I don't like the  
> idea of
> having a \language command *and* the old \include method.  If we want to  
> move to
> \language (which is a good idea), then we'd remove the language  
> definitions from the
> ly/ dir.

IIRC, we added the functionality to support the new crescendo commands,  
thus making it possible to use
them, without eliminating the old crescendo commands.

Why could we not do the same with language selection, particularly since  
there is an immediate need to have
language selection in safe mode?

Thanks,

Carl



--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings