[regtests] quote-tie.ly: illegal example?.. BUG?..

[Dmytro O. Redchuk]

Hi.

In "quote-tie.ly":

"Voices from different cues must not be tied together. In this example,
the first note has a tie. This note should not be tied to the 2nd note."

But there is no 2nd note, only 1st and 3rd.

So, i mean, this example seems to be constructed in a way which does not
allow to check...

I would change the snippet [1] to smth like this:

% -------------8<--------------------------
cueI = \relative c'' {
    a1 ~ | a | a |
}
\addQuote "cueI" { \cueI }

cueII = \relative c'' {
    R1 | a2 a | e |
}
\addQuote "cueII" { \cueII }

\new Staff {
    \cueDuring "cueI" #UP { R1 } |
    \cueDuring "cueII" #UP { R1 } |
    R1
}
% -------------8<--------------------------


And *then* the first (a1) really *is* tied to the second (a2) note, from
another voice.

Again, *please* --- i can miss a lot actually :-)

I've never ever tried to think about voice quotations... I've read doc
for \cueDuring right for this issue.

______________________
 1. http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/input/regression/fe/lily-4832412f.ly

-- 
Dmytro O. Redchuk

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This email was sent in hope in can help. If it is not,
 feel free to ignore it or send back any helpful email. Thank You a lot!

quote-tie.png
Description: PNG image