[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug team
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: bug team |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:55:28 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 07:11:41PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> James Bailey <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I think I'm going to agree with "bug squad" although being fully aware
> > of the meaning of "buggers", I think it's awesome.
>
> "buggers" is an informal name for people _planting_ electronic
> eavesdropping devices.
That still works! I prefer to think of these people -- remember,
they're not programmers or people *fixing* bugs -- as "adding" bug
issues to the tracker. Each issue is an "eavesdropping device"
aimed at recording information about a particular thing (i.e. the
bug or missing feature at hand).
I also still adore the name "bugger" because the Frogs can start
cursing them. "oh, those buggers, always adding more work for
us". :)
Since James liked the term, and I like it, let's make this a real
proposal. Valentin, Dmytro: do you mind this term? Since you
three are the team, your voices count for a lot on this question.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: bug team, David Kastrup, 2010/02/01
- Re: bug team, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2010/02/01
- Re: bug team, Francisco Vila, 2010/02/01
- Re: bug team, James Bailey, 2010/02/01
- Re: bug team, David Kastrup, 2010/02/01
- Re: bug team, Oscar van Dillen, 2010/02/01
- Re: bug team,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: bug team, Valentin Villenave, 2010/02/01
- Re: bug team, Trevor Daniels, 2010/02/01
- Re: bug team, Graham Percival, 2010/02/01
- Re: bug team, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/01
- Re: bug team, Valentin Villenave, 2010/02/01
- Re: bug team, James Bailey, 2010/02/01
- Re: bug team, Graham Percival, 2010/02/02
- Re: bug team, David Kastrup, 2010/02/02
- Re: bug team, James Bailey, 2010/02/01
- Re: bug team, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2010/02/01