[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: checking CG 7. issues
From: |
Dmytro O. Redchuk |
Subject: |
Re: checking CG 7. issues |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:51:53 +0200 |
У сб, 2010-02-06 у 23:59 +0100, James Bailey пише:
> On 06.02.2010, at 21:34, Graham Percival wrote:
> > Also, please note that although **I'll** be advertising for more Bug
> > Squadders, I don't want to train any volunteers myself. Instead, I
> > want to pair newbies up with you three people. So the better you can
> > make the CG chapter, the fewer questions you'll have to answer. :)
> > (or at least, if somebody asks something that's covered in the CG, you
> > can just point to the CG section rather than typing an answer from
> > scratch)
Actually, some guidance may be needed in any case (thank you for yours),
at least like "yes, you've understood that right".
Now i try to remember what i _definitely could not_ find in CG...
I guess it will be easier to remember if being asked ;)
> > Oh, that reminded me: Dmytro, if there's any new bug reports, pick one
> > and try adding it to the tracker. Read CG 7.2 in detail before you do
> > that. I expect that you'll encounter a few problems, but this will be
> > a good test of the CG on this topic.
Well...
I'd say everything is clear --- if i didn't any mistake...
*If*, i mean.
> And 7.6 Finding the cause of a regression may
> be a job that a non-programmer can do, but it should be notated that
> one needs to understand git, which most non-programmers are probably
> not familiar with.
Would be great to have this job explained in more details. I feel i can
want to ask about this in some near future.
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk