bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: checking CG 7. issues


From: Dmytro O. Redchuk
Subject: Re: checking CG 7. issues
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:51:53 +0200

У сб, 2010-02-06 у 23:59 +0100, James Bailey пише:
> On 06.02.2010, at 21:34, Graham Percival wrote:
> > Also, please note that although **I'll** be advertising for more Bug
> > Squadders, I don't want to train any volunteers myself.  Instead, I
> > want to pair newbies up with you three people.  So the better you can
> > make the CG chapter, the fewer questions you'll have to answer.  :)
> > (or at least, if somebody asks something that's covered in the CG, you
> > can just point to the CG section rather than typing an answer from
> > scratch)
Actually, some guidance may be needed in any case (thank you for yours),
at least like "yes, you've understood that right".

Now i try to remember what i _definitely could not_ find in CG...
I guess it will be easier to remember if being asked ;)

> > Oh, that reminded me: Dmytro, if there's any new bug reports, pick one
> > and try adding it to the tracker.  Read CG 7.2 in detail before you do
> > that.  I expect that you'll encounter a few problems, but this will be
> > a good test of the CG on this topic.
Well...

I'd say everything is clear --- if i didn't any mistake...
*If*, i mean.

> And 7.6 Finding the cause of a regression may  
> be a job that a non-programmer can do, but it should be notated that  
> one needs to understand git, which most non-programmers are probably  
> not familiar with.
Would be great to have this job explained in more details. I feel i can
want to ask about this in some near future.

-- 
  Dmytro O. Redchuk





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]