[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Not a duration. Why not?
|
From: |
Dmytro O. Redchuk |
|
Subject: |
Re: Not a duration. Why not? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:35:41 +0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sun Apr 25, 17:31 You wrote:
> g4 g8. g16 a4 g8. g16 g4 f8. e16 d2 (chorus from "Waltzing Matilda")
[...]
> That means the above music sequence can be written in "quick" style as:
> g4 3 g a g3 g g f3 e d2
:-)
This remembered me (i dont know why, sorry, no offence) Euro-English joke:
http://www.icw-net.com/howto/funstuff/euroengl.htm
So, i mean probably that former style is far more readable (and thus
writeable, i'd say).
Sorry for the noise!
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk