Re: subdivideBeams fails

[Neil Puttock]

On 11 May 2010 19:51, Xavier Scheuer <address@hidden> wrote:

> @Patrick:
> I think I will never agree with the choice of issue's priority,
> I would definitely set this one to "Priority-Medium" instead of
> "Priority-Low" as there is no trivial workaround here
> (apart from using manual beaming [ ] in each involved measure).
> Or maybe I'm wrong about this.

I agree, but would go a bit further: this broke between 2.10 and 2.12,
so it should be classified as a critical regression.

Cheers,
Neil