Re: Updated CG 7 Issues -- new policies for Bug Squad

[Graham Percival]

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk
<address@hidden> wrote:
> 1. "If the behaviour is expected, the user should be told to read the
> documentation"...
>
> Isn't it a task for "Support" team? If i asked smth. like mentioned here in
> bug-lilypond, i would consider as a quite normal answer "please ask this in
> lilypond-user"

True.  I've added a point to direct questions about program usage to
lilypond-user.

> 7.2 Issue classification
>
> So, i would propose to leave "The Bug Squad should classify issues according
> to the guidelines given below" or like that.

Ok, changed.  I really just wanted to discourage more long discussions
about the classification, but you're quite correct that it wasn't
worded well.


> 7.3 Adding issues to the tracker
>
> I would mention smth like "Added issue is always better then missed. We aware
> of that fact that some issues may be "Invalid"; anyway in every case false
> negatives are better then missed negatives.

Done.


I'll send an email when the updated guidelines are online.

Cheers,
- Graham