bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Updated CG 7 Issues, draft 2


From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: Updated CG 7 Issues, draft 2
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 18:04:50 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 06:32:55PM +0200, James Bailey wrote:
>
> On 05.06.2010, at 11:48, Graham Percival wrote:
>
>> I've updated CG 7 Issues:
>> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/contributor/issues.html
>
> Maybe it's simply how I process information, but I think of the list at 
> 7.1 as:
> Is #1 true? Yes, proceed. No? Go to #2
> Is #2 true? Yes, proceed. No? Go to #3…

Aye, that's definitely the intent.

> Given that order of operations, I think it would make more sense for the 
> ordering to be:
> 1, 3, 4, 5, 2, 6 (or something along those lines). Maybe this is just me 
> trying to impose my understanding onto something that already makes sense 
> as it is.

To save people looking it up: #2 is "tell the user to make a Tiny
example if it isn't already".

Based on our discussions yesterday, I had the impression that we
still wanted to reject bug reports if the user hadn't made a Tiny
example.  In other words, if somebody sends the first movement of
their symphony and says "the 2nd horn part in bar 37 looks bad",
we immediately reject it and tell them to create a Tiny example.
(without even looking at bar 37, or trying to figure out if it's
already in the tracker, etc)


As a policy question, I have no strong feelings -- I'm not going
to be doing this work.  As a doc-writing question, I'm happy that 
this portion of the CG is clear, so we can have one discussion
(now) about this.


(of course, nothing in the CG should imply that you can't do more
work if you want to -- if you feel like examining a large score,
or making a Tiny example because you like the person, or you want
to encourage speakers of your native language, or because he's
also writing for ditheridoo and you want more lilypond-published
ditheridoo music in the world... go right ahead!  My only concern
in the CG is that we have a written policy of what Bug Squad
members should be expected to do, mainly so that potential
volunteers have a better idea of what they're getting into.)

Cheers,
- Graham



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]