bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What's the deal with this "programming error"?


From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: What's the deal with this "programming error"?
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:17:36 +0100

David,

I wrote to you privately to say that I was aware of your report, and
would send an "ungently public reminder to the Bug Squad if they
hadn't dealt with it in a few days".

Now, you could argue that it had been more than "a few days", but I
wanted to give them a few days to catch up without having the
distraction of a new draft of the Issues CG chapter.  You may have
noticed that I hadn't sent any request to review the third draft of
this chapter, despite me making some significant changes to the
version in git.  In fact, earlier today Valentin seemed to be catching
up on old issues, so there's some evidence that my hope wasn't
completely in vain.

Please trust me a bit more.  If you disagreed with my waiting, I would
have hoped that you would have asked me privately why I wasn't yelling
at them yet, since I specifically wrote to you privately to explain
the situation, and said that I was quite prepared to yell at them.

Herding cats is not easy; please don't make my job harder.

- Graham


On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:52 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Uh, am I by now in everybody's killfile, or do people just enjoy having
> me throw a fit for every contribution?  If it is the latter, I am afraid
> that I am currently hospitalized because of my blood pressure and I sort
> of think that my doctors would disapprove.  Tough luck.  Maybe next
> time.
>
> Anyway, I should think that this bug description including a list of
> relevant examples should warrant being recorded by the bug squad.
>
> All the best.
>
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>> I get the following two "programming error"s.  What's up?
>>
>> A simpler test case is
>>
>> \new Voice \with {\consists "Ambitus_engraver"} { \new Voice { c'' } }
>>
>> The key point appears to be that the music written in the inner voice
>> apparently is sufficient for triggering some processing that would
>> require the c'' to be actually in the voice with the Ambitus_engraver.
>>
>> The error occurs even if there are any notes after the inner voice.  It
>> does not occur when any music (including just s) is placed before the
>> inner voice.  This seems to depend on both timing as well as notes:
>>
>> \new Voice \with {\consists "Ambitus_engraver"} { s4 \new Voice { c''4 }  }
>>
>> creates no error.
>>
>> \new Voice \with {\consists "Ambitus_engraver"} { c4*0 \new Voice { c''4 }  }
>>
>> creates no error.
>>
>> \new Voice \with {\consists "Ambitus_engraver"} { s4*0 \new Voice { c''4 }  }
>>
>> creates the above errors.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]