[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's the deal with this "programming error"?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: What's the deal with this "programming error"? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:37:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> PS note that the "new email checklist" does *not* contain an item for
> "ignore the email and hope that somebody else handles it". If you
> can't reject the report for having no Tiny example, no version number,
> not being able to reproduce it, etc., then you MUST move on to the
> final point, namely adding it to the tracker.
I should think that asking for the missing information (with copy on the
bug list so that other members of the squad might be aware of the
response) should be a valid option as well.
For the sake of not eventually getting swamped by leftovers, "add it to
the tracker" would likely be a better choice over "make a mental note to
ask for more information Real Soon Now (TM)".
And of course, adding more information is done _automatically_ when
someone responds to the tracked report. So adding to the tracker with a
canned phrase "Small example, and error symptom still missing" might
well be a safe choice in any case.
--
David Kastrup
Re: What's the deal with this "programming error"?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2010/06/10
Re: What's the deal with this "programming error"?,
David Kastrup <=
Re: What's the deal with this "programming error"?, Graham Percival, 2010/06/10
Re: What's the deal with this "programming error"?, David Kastrup, 2010/06/10
Re: What's the deal with this "programming error"?, Graham Percival, 2010/06/10
Re: What's the deal with this "programming error"?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2010/06/09