Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only intheregtests

[Phil Holmes]

"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> wrote in message 
news:address@hidden
> <address@hidden> wrote in message 
> news:address@hidden
> > Comment #14 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information 
> > is only in the regtests
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989
> >
> > PS the easiest way to figure out what's "blocking work" would just be to 
> > go  to the top of the list and find the first regtest that isn't 
> > completely  finished.  Figure out what that one needs, then either do it 
> > or ask for  help with it.  Once that's finished, move on to the next one.
> >
> > I think that a steady "10 minutes per day" will be the best approach 
> > re  -- that gives time for experienced developers to make suggestions or 
> > point  out mistakes, before you've spent a lot of effort doing something 
> > the wrong  way.
>
> <fx>Waves hand in air</fx>
>
> I was going to have another look at this tomorrow, starting by sorting the 
> Wiki entries into "need work", "fixed" and "not a documentation issue".
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
> Bug Squad

I've now reorganised the Wiki at http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/Regtests 
and will pick this up this week.

--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad