Re: Bug in scipt placement in chords?

[Phil Holmes]

Not sure if that's what you meant.  Currently we have:

 < c_^ e^^ > 4
 < c_^ e^^ > 4

Think we should have:

 < c_^ e^^ > 4
 < c_^ e_^ > 4

No ^_

--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad


"Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote in message 
news:address@hidden
The regtest has been changed to test ^ _ and _ ^   .  No code has been
changed; if .27 looks bad (well, if there's a mismatch between text
and graphics), then please add an issue.

Cheers,
- Graham


On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> The regtest or the behaviour?
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
> Bug Squad
>
>
> "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote in message
> news:address@hidden
> Thanks, changed in git. It should look different in 2.13.27.
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Carrying on looking at documenting undocumented regtests and came across
> > chord-scripts.ly. It looks from this as if the regtest is trying to
> > demonstrate placement of scripts above and below the chord. 
> > Unfortunately,
> > this doesn't seem to work. There's also what seems to be a bug in the
> > regtest itself, with the line < c_^ e^^ > 4 being repeated, instead of 
> > one
> > occurrence being < c_^ e_^ > 4 which I guess is what's needed. If someone
> > can confirm these are bugs, I'll raise reports.
> >
> > \relative c''{
> > <c^^>4
> > <c_^>4
> > c^^
> > c_^
> > }
> >
> >
> > --
> > Phil Holmes
> > Bug Squad
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bug-lilypond mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond