Re: Strange behaviour with transposing clefs

[Patrick McCarty]

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> I've been experimenting with transposing clefs to write a snippet, and found
> that if you try to transpose a clef with a zero transposition, you actually
> get 2.  Trying 2 gives no clef at all.  Trying 1 (for what it's worth) gives
> a clef but no transposition.
>
> I think the behaviour with 1 is correct, since a transposition of 8 actually
> moves 7 notes, but I think the 2 and 0 are the result of just adding a
> fiddle factor without checking the result.  Not convinced anyone will use
> these odd numbers, but still think it's a bug?
>
> \relative c' {
>  \clef treble
>  c c c c
>  \clef "treble^0"
>  c c c c
>  \clef "treble_2"
>  c c c c
>  \clef "treble_0"
>  c c c c
>  \clef "treble^2"
>  c c c c
> }

This appears to be a bug.  I'll look into it shortly, though I can't
file a proper report at the moment.

Thanks,
Patrick