Re: Bug squad: remember the regtest comparison

[Dmytro O. Redchuk]

On Wed 04 Aug 2010, 20:23 Neil Puttock wrote:
> There's something fishy about the latest comparisons: a number of .log
> changes suggest broken regtests,
Sorry, could not catch that --- what exactly in test output[1] suggests broken
regtests?

Would anyone explain me, please?

I've looked again in the manual[2] and couldn't find any relevant information.
(Probably, something should be added to the docs, too?..)

Thanks!

> and if you check collated-files.html,
> they are visibly broken (e.g., bookparts.ly:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/input/regression/collated-files.html#bookparts.ly);
>  but they appear to be false positives (at least for the mingw binary
> and master).

________________________________
  1. http://lilypond.org/test/v2.13.29-1/compare-v2.13.28-1/index.html
  2. 
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/precompiled-regression-tests#Regression-test-comparison

-- 
  Dmytro O. Redchuk
  Bug Squad