Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 5

[Keith E OHara]

On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 03:12:38 -0700, bug-lilypond-request wrote:
> Check the first two systems on the second page of the following score:
> \repeat unfold 80 { <c'''-1 e'''-3 g'''-5> c' <c,-1 e,-3 g,-5> c' }
> Perhaps skylines should not be taken as literally as that, but padded
> out somewhat.

Do you mean padded out sideways, or vertically?

The 2.12.3 output is not terribly different, and just a slight increase in 
padding solves (to my standards) the issue pointed out.
 \paper {
   between-system-spacing =
     % Bump up padding from 1 to 2 staffspacings; others are defaults for 
12.13.35
     #'((space . 12) (minimum-distance . 8) (padding . 2))
 \paper {ragged-bottom=##t}
 \repeat unfold 80 { <c'''-1 e'''-3 g'''-5> c' <c,-1 e,-3 g,-5> c'}

What bothers me is when things don't quite line up vertically, such as on the 
first page if we ragged-bottom.  Then the fingerings collide in 2.13.35 (but 
2.12.3 was fine).  Image attached corresponding to the input above.

Bug squad,
I put my default padding suggestion in a comment to issue 1290 (created from 
the original report)
but
I don't know if the collision in my attached image is what David Kastrup really 
meant, the same bug, or a different bug.
--
Keith

collision_similar_1290.png
Description: PNG image