[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autobeaming and cadenzas (was: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: Autobeaming and cadenzas (was: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11) |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:35:26 -0700 |
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I agree that a revert would be more appropriate. However, a revert would
> be very difficult to accomplish, because there is no easy way to save the
> "original" value. The value is only known in the translation stage as a
> context property, so we can't really save the value for use in the parsing
> stage.
>
> Right now, the benefit/time ration isn't high enough for me to code the
> revert.
>
> I'm fine to have an enhancement request to implement it as a revert,
> however.
Reported here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1304
Thanks,
Patrick
- Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11, Keith E OHara, 2010/10/05
- Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11, Carl Sorensen, 2010/10/05
- Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11, David Kastrup, 2010/10/06
- Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2010/10/06
- Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11, David Kastrup, 2010/10/06
- Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2010/10/06
- Re: Autobeaming and cadenzas (was: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11), Carl Sorensen, 2010/10/06
- Re: Autobeaming and cadenzas (was: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11), Patrick McCarty, 2010/10/07
- Re: Autobeaming and cadenzas (was: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11), Patrick McCarty, 2010/10/07
- Re: Autobeaming and cadenzas (was: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11),
Patrick McCarty <=