bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: \afterGrace question/issue


From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: \afterGrace question/issue
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:02:39 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5

Hi Dmytro,

while I think the behaviour is (nearly) consistent with the documentation I think it should be discussed. Opened and commented as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1329
Am 11.10.2010 14:02, schrieb Dmytro O. Redchuk:
Hi.

Playing with \afterGrace (rather simply "typing" it) i've found this somewhat
strange. Documentation says that \afterGrace should last 3/4 of of the length
of the main note by default and this fraction may be changed. But looking at
the picture i would rather say that it lasts for "some small value" and
"wastes" 3/4 (1/2 in the last staff) of the length of the main note (makes it
"void"). Listening to midi -- it sounds in the middle of the note (for the
last staff), really (as a separate track?).

%
% a bit modified version of
% http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/28/lily-25f937e5.ly,
% see example in
% 
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concerns#grace-notes
%
\relative c'' {
   <<
     \new Staff {
       c1 \afterGrace d1 { c16[ d] } c1
     }
     \new Staff {
       c1
       c8 c c c c c c c
       c1
     }
     \new Staff {
       #(define afterGraceFraction (cons 1 2))
       c1 \afterGrace d1 { c16[ d] } c1
     }
   >>
}


Actually i don't know who this picture should look like.

Please, can anyone clarify that? What can be considered as an issue (if any)
and what is exactly as it should be?

Thanks!


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]