[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.13.40 regtests
|
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
|
Subject: |
Re: 2.13.40 regtests |
|
Date: |
Sun, 21 Nov 2010 14:12:54 +0100 |
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> _However_. Shouldn't the regtest comparison for
> figured-bass-continuation-forbid.ly flag the change as well?
I'm not sure I understand: do you mean that /disappearing/ errors
should be flagged?
Valentin.
- 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/21
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/11/21
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/21
- Message not available
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/21
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Neil Puttock, 2010/11/23
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/24
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Neil Puttock, 2010/11/24
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/25
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Neil Puttock, 2010/11/25
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/25