Re: Accidental and clef change issue

[David Kastrup]

Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden> writes:

> Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010, um 14:23:14 schrieb Phil Holmes:
>> "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote in message
>> > I don't think it is correct.  If you set the above with \key g\major,
>> > you will notice that the key signature is _not_ repeated with a clef
>> > change.  So there is no visual or logical reason to assume "accidentals
>> > are reset".  If that was the underlying assumption for a clef change,
>> > the key signature would be repeated.
>> 
>> So I'm confused as to what the regtest text cited means.  It
>> (accidental-clef-change.ly) says "Accidentals are reset for clef changes."
>
>
> I would be great, though, if anyone can find a published example of such a 
> situation (most likely in e.g. cello/bassoon parts/scores, which frequently 
> switch between bass and tenor clef).

Edition Peters, piano excerpt by Brissler from Mozart Requiem,
"Confutatis".  The g in the corni di bassotto entry is not even in the
same octave, and still gets a natural.

confutatis.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

-- 
David Kastrup