Re: desired behaviour

[Keith OHara]

On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:19:04 -0800, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
> To be clear, you're suggesting that we remove the octavation
> example and use this instead?
Yes.

> I'm not entirely sold on this particular example -- it doesn't
> follow our input syntax style, and if we add all the line breaks
> that would be required, it gets a bit long.  Can you (or anybody
> else) create a different example, or modify the existing one?

I was thinking of one real bug that was re-reported last week, which can be 
extremely brief:

% There should be a natural printed after the sharp
\version "2.12.3"
<< f' \\ fis' >>


The regression tests are of this form, and I think a lot came from real bugs.
This one makes the point that correct notation is not always immediately 
obvious:

% Accidentals should be printed for only the first note in a tie
\version "2.10.1"
\relative c'' {
  bes1 ~ |
  bes1
}