Re: desired behaviour

[Keith OHara]

On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 02:26:08 -0800, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:>

> > % Accidentals should be printed for only the first note in a tie
> > \version "2.10.1"
> > \relative c'' {
> >   bes1 ~ |
> >   bes1
> > }
>
> What about using this one?  It's even shorter, it captures the
> essence, and seems ideal.  (personally I'd remove the barline
> check because it's not necessary, but other than that it's
> perfect)

I still like it.

A couple recent bug reports came with a positive statement like this (as opposed simply 
"doesn't work").  There was disagreement on what we should want, but no 
misunderstanding of what was meant.
-Keith