Re: horizontal spacing regression

[Carl Sorensen]

On 1/13/11 4:56 PM, "Keith OHara" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Dear Bug Squad
>    This is the only unreported regression I know about.
> It change since 2.12.3, and although I did not get a huge response over on
> -user, we agree it got worse.
> I believe this tiny example captures what we did not like in the real music
> examples from that thread.
> 
> 
> % Note spacing should not be affected by accidentals unless necessary.
> % Here, spacing is tightened near accidentals
> 
> \version "2.13.43"
> {
>    \repeat unfold 8 {f'8 bes' d'' f'' \noBreak }
>    \break
>    \repeat unfold 12 {f'8 bes' d'' f'' \noBreak }
> }

Here's a workaround.  I haven't done a regtest, so I don't know if this is
something we want to add to the definition in scm/define-grobs.scm.

version "2.13.46"
{
   \override Accidental #'extra-spacing-height = #'(-0.5 . 0.5)
   \repeat unfold 8 {f'8 bes' d'' f'' \noBreak }
   \break
   \repeat unfold 12 {f'8 bes' d'' f'' \noBreak }
}

HTH,

Carl

tucking with extra-spacing-height.png
Description: tucking with extra-spacing-height.png