[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: horizontal spacing regression
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: horizontal spacing regression |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 03:02:51 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Opera Mail/11.00 (Win32) |
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 01:21:17 -0800, Jan Warchoł <address@hidden> wrote:
I mean, this [A: extra space for flats ] looks to my eye worse than this [B: no
extra space]
I agree. In tight spacing the tucking looks nice. This comparison is identical
to the second line of the image I posted at the start of the thread,
A: 2.12.3 B: 2.13.43
Now I have to be honest about my use of \noBreak. The two lines are within the
spacings accepted by 2.13.43 (that is, \noBreak can be removed with no change).
However, if we prevent the notes from tucking under flats (either with
extra-spacing height or by using ver2.12.3) then LilyPond wants to split that
tight line into two. So Lilypond tries to avoid the ugly A.
- Re: horizontal spacing regression, (continued)
- Re: horizontal spacing regression, Carl Sorensen, 2011/01/13
- Re: horizontal spacing regression, Keith OHara, 2011/01/13
- Re: horizontal spacing regression, Carl Sorensen, 2011/01/14
- Re: horizontal spacing regression, Jan Warchoł, 2011/01/15
- Re: horizontal spacing regression, Trevor Daniels, 2011/01/15
- Re: horizontal spacing regression, Jan Warchoł, 2011/01/15
- Re: horizontal spacing regression,
Keith OHara <=
Re: horizontal spacing regression, Phil Holmes, 2011/01/14
Re: horizontal spacing regression, Keith OHara, 2011/01/14