Re: Issue 1417 in lilypond: regtests "time" field is broken

[lilypond]

Updates:
        Labels: -Patch Patch-needs_work

Comment #2 on issue 1417 by percival.music.ca: regtests "time" field is  
broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1417

Hmm.  I'm going to say "patch-needs_work", not because the patch doesn't  
work, but rather because I'd like somebody to go to the next step.  Should  
we change the current weighing of cells vs. time?  Can we see any actual  
cases where the "time" field makes a difference?
(I just tried it with the optimization in 1211, and the regtest checker  
didn't report any changes in time!)

I might come back and look at in this in the coming week(s), but if anybody  
else wants to take a whack at these questions, that would be great.