[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unnecessary accidental after tied note at the beginning of a new sys
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Unnecessary accidental after tied note at the beginning of a new system |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Mar 2011 18:35:37 +0000 |
On 6 March 2011 16:34, Zoltan Selyem <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> % Hello,
> %
> % Accidentals on tied notes are printed at the beginning of a new
> % system. But I think that in these cases there should be no second
> % accidental in that measure.
> %
> % So I think measure 5, 9, and 13 are wrong in the following example:
>
> \version "2.13.53"
> \paper{ ragged-right = ##t }
> \relative a' {
> \key f \major
> as2 as~ | as as~ | \break
> as~ as~ | as as~ | \break
> as as | b b~ | \break
> b~ b~ | b b~ | \break
> b b | cis cis~ | \break
> cis~ cis~ | cis cis~ | \break
> cis cis
> }
I agree. I posted a tracker issue for this, but it was marked as
invalid, despite my producing several examples from engraved scores:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=649
Cheers,
Neil