Re: lilypond v2.13.54

[-Eluze]

Phil Holmes-2 wrote:
> 
> It looks like the LilyPond installation is no longer adding the path to
> the executable to the Windows PATH.  I have installed .54 and don't have
> it on my path.  For me that's actually good - my PATH variable overflowed
> and I lost all the ones I wanted.  However, for people who rely on the
> command line, it'll mean LP won't run.  Can someone check whether this has
> been changed in the Windows install?
> 

i cleaned my path and downloaded 2.13.54 - lilypond is in the path again!

couldn't the path be checked before a lilypond entry is appended?

cheers
Eluze

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-lilypond-v2.13.54-tp31171211p31171995.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.