Re: Issue 1608 in lilypond: patch to prevent rests from shifting

[Graham Percival]

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:06:52PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
> My fault, Graham.  I raised issue 1604 last night, and Mike posted a
> patch on reitveld in response, this morning.  Unusually for Mike,
> bless his productive cotton socks, his posting on -devel actually
> referred to 1604.

Whoops.  My fault, then.

> I see there is a feature request outstanding on the codereview issue
> tracker, asking for grouping of issues by project, but that is a
> halfway measure for us: our problems come from issues being reported
> and discussed on any one, two, or all of three mailing lists, while
> patches are discussed, but not trackable on a separate system
> entirely. This incident may well serve as the classic example of the
> problem.

We certainly have problems, but this incident isn't an example of
those.  I was hurridly getting rid of emails at the kitchen table
while water was boiling, and I didn't notice the all-important
number 1604 when looking at Mike's emails.  If I'd read it a
little bit more carefully, there wouldn't have been any problem.

Cheers,
- Graham