[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Possible regression in 2.13 series? "no viable configuration" warning
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Possible regression in 2.13 series? "no viable configuration" warning |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:39:58 +0200 |
Greetings everybody,
I've been pulling my hair all day long on this one, I may be getting
crazy or perhaps you'll be able to reproduce this as well;
Have a look at the following snippet, pretty straightforward:
<<
\new Staff = "md" \relative c' {
r4 r8 s s2
r4 r8 s s2
r4 e, r2 |
}
\new Staff = "mg" \relative c'' {
b8 f' c' \change Staff = "md" <g, c f>~
<g c f>2 \change Staff = "mg" |
bes8 fes' ces' \change Staff = "md" <g, c f>~
<g c f>2 \change Staff = "mg" |
R1
}
>>
This compiles fine, but with any recent build you'll get a "no viable
configuration found" warning. Since I didn't remember having
encountered such a warning with older versions, I tried other GUB
builds.
2.12.* and below: produces no warning
2.13.0 - 2.13.6: crashes with a segfault. (WTF?)
2.13.7 and above: "no viable configuration" warning.
Changing any note in the snippet prevents makes the warning disappear.
As does removing the last measure (although there is no cross-staff
voodoo in it).
Consider me a control freak, but I just hate it when my scores
produces compilation warnings that I can't fix.
Cheers,
Valentin.
- Possible regression in 2.13 series? "no viable configuration" warning,
Valentin Villenave <=