Re: Issue 1716 in lilypond: No convert-ly rule for the fix for issue 1655

[lilypond]

Comment #5 on issue 1716 by address@hidden: No convert-ly rule for the  
fix for issue 1655
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1716

> So are you comfortable with a genera rule that says something like "If a  
> user knows enough to play around with internal properties, they know  
> enough to deal with the elimination of internal properties without us  
> giving them an indication"?

I'd be perfectly happy with this rule.  The internal properties are quite  
well hidden in the IR, and in many cases it's not really clear how they  
might be useful without consulting the source code.